<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three-man game in NBA Finals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsmediajournal.com/2009/06/11/three-man-game-in-nba-finals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2009/06/11/three-man-game-in-nba-finals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: NMS</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2009/06/11/three-man-game-in-nba-finals/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>NMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/?p=1210#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>You can also see this with ESPN&#039;s Sunday Night Baseball. Jon Miller + Joe Morgan + Steve Phillips = awkward disaster.  I&#039;m okay with Miller, but the other two are poor excuses for color commentators.  If you only have one of them, it&#039;s at least tolerable.  With both of them it&#039;s atrocious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also see this with ESPN&#8217;s Sunday Night Baseball. Jon Miller + Joe Morgan + Steve Phillips = awkward disaster.  I&#8217;m okay with Miller, but the other two are poor excuses for color commentators.  If you only have one of them, it&#8217;s at least tolerable.  With both of them it&#8217;s atrocious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Finarelli</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2009/06/11/three-man-game-in-nba-finals/comment-page-1/#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Finarelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/?p=1210#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>Ray:

You said:

&quot;Three in a booth — no matter the sport — is never better than two.&quot;

In the vast majority of cases you are right, but please tip your hat to the &quot;Three in a booth&quot; tandem of Gifford/Cosell/Meredith.  That trio worked - - and I submit that it worked better than any two of the three would have worked as a pair.

Also, the three man &quot;booth&quot; of Dick Enberg/Billy Packer/Al McGuire doing NCAA basketball in the early 1980s was also excellent.

If you say these are the exceptions that prove your rule, so be it.  But those &quot;Three man booths&quot; need to be recognized for their excellence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray:</p>
<p>You said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Three in a booth — no matter the sport — is never better than two.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the vast majority of cases you are right, but please tip your hat to the &#8220;Three in a booth&#8221; tandem of Gifford/Cosell/Meredith.  That trio worked &#8211; - and I submit that it worked better than any two of the three would have worked as a pair.</p>
<p>Also, the three man &#8220;booth&#8221; of Dick Enberg/Billy Packer/Al McGuire doing NCAA basketball in the early 1980s was also excellent.</p>
<p>If you say these are the exceptions that prove your rule, so be it.  But those &#8220;Three man booths&#8221; need to be recognized for their excellence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

