<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESPN Stretching on Owens/Witten Rift Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsmediajournal.com/2008/12/14/espn-stretching-on-owenswitten-rift-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2008/12/14/espn-stretching-on-owenswitten-rift-coverage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wood</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2008/12/14/espn-stretching-on-owenswitten-rift-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/?p=480#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>Witten is an amazing tight end! He is a big target that you really can&#039;t pass up. If it&#039;s third down, who would you throw to: a person who might very well drop drop the ball, or a person who will catch the ball and probably break a few tackles before getting the first down. I think that T.O. is more a a first or second down receiver, rather than a third down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witten is an amazing tight end! He is a big target that you really can&#8217;t pass up. If it&#8217;s third down, who would you throw to: a person who might very well drop drop the ball, or a person who will catch the ball and probably break a few tackles before getting the first down. I think that T.O. is more a a first or second down receiver, rather than a third down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2008/12/14/espn-stretching-on-owenswitten-rift-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/?p=480#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>Agreed on most of your points. Owens is a deep threat and even when he&#039;s not getting the ball, he&#039;s drawing doubles which helps his team; not always to win, but he helps them.

My main issue is the revisionist history by ESPN&#039;s coverage (and they&#039;re not alone, just about the entire media has played it out this way, taking ESPN&#039;s lead) that it&#039;s been TO and TO alone that has a problem with Romo and Witten and that he&#039;s going behind their backs and causing this huge rift in the team. That&#039;s just not true. Crayton, Williams, Gurode, and others all have stood up and said that the Witten/Romo thing may have gone too far and called Witten out for supposedly going to the media anonymously (as the source for Ed Werder&#039;s reports). Like it or not, Owens never does anything anonymously--which may also be a part of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on most of your points. Owens is a deep threat and even when he&#8217;s not getting the ball, he&#8217;s drawing doubles which helps his team; not always to win, but he helps them.</p>
<p>My main issue is the revisionist history by ESPN&#8217;s coverage (and they&#8217;re not alone, just about the entire media has played it out this way, taking ESPN&#8217;s lead) that it&#8217;s been TO and TO alone that has a problem with Romo and Witten and that he&#8217;s going behind their backs and causing this huge rift in the team. That&#8217;s just not true. Crayton, Williams, Gurode, and others all have stood up and said that the Witten/Romo thing may have gone too far and called Witten out for supposedly going to the media anonymously (as the source for Ed Werder&#8217;s reports). Like it or not, Owens never does anything anonymously&#8211;which may also be a part of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unnamed Source</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2008/12/14/espn-stretching-on-owenswitten-rift-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>Unnamed Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/?p=480#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>I look at this 2 ways:

1) Whitten, for the most part, gets the job done.  He&#039;s supposed to be a clutch receiver but look at what happens deep-- when Romo does get the ball to the receiver, it tends to be dropped or missed altogether.  I&#039;m talking balls on the numbers that wind up in the turf.  Whitten loses a few here and there, but not like the others, especially T.O.

2) T.O. is a prima donna.  He always has been.  The stuff he&#039;s airing out should be talked out man-to-man, not man-to-media.  And while he doesn&#039;t always do it directly, he manages to get Romo/Whitten trash talk into the news.  He&#039;s also instigating the complaints by other receivers, so their involvement has to be taken with a grain of salt.

Bottom line, I don&#039;t blame Romo for locking on Jason Whitten.  I watch the games and it looks like he has little choice most of the time.  I even suspect that T.O. is passive-aggressively screwing up routes and completions just to make a point, and that Romo is picking up on that.

Anyway, it&#039;s time for the highly-paid crybabies involved to grow up and just play, like they did against the Giants.  And it&#039;s past time for Jerry Jones and Wade Phillips to quit kissing T.O.&#039;s butt and start taking team dischord seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I look at this 2 ways:</p>
<p>1) Whitten, for the most part, gets the job done.  He&#8217;s supposed to be a clutch receiver but look at what happens deep&#8211; when Romo does get the ball to the receiver, it tends to be dropped or missed altogether.  I&#8217;m talking balls on the numbers that wind up in the turf.  Whitten loses a few here and there, but not like the others, especially T.O.</p>
<p>2) T.O. is a prima donna.  He always has been.  The stuff he&#8217;s airing out should be talked out man-to-man, not man-to-media.  And while he doesn&#8217;t always do it directly, he manages to get Romo/Whitten trash talk into the news.  He&#8217;s also instigating the complaints by other receivers, so their involvement has to be taken with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Bottom line, I don&#8217;t blame Romo for locking on Jason Whitten.  I watch the games and it looks like he has little choice most of the time.  I even suspect that T.O. is passive-aggressively screwing up routes and completions just to make a point, and that Romo is picking up on that.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s time for the highly-paid crybabies involved to grow up and just play, like they did against the Giants.  And it&#8217;s past time for Jerry Jones and Wade Phillips to quit kissing T.O.&#8217;s butt and start taking team dischord seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

