Monthly Archives: April 2008

What They’re Saying, April 25, 2008

The sports media columnists are having their say this Friday…Here is what’s on their minds…

Much is being said about this weekend’s NFL Draft. Michael Hiestand of USA Today takes a look at what we are expected to hear.

Bob Wolfley at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has a look at what people talk about after the draft on “Snap Judgement Monday.

Barry Jackson at the Miami Herald says the pace of the draft should quicken this year.

Judd Zulgad at the Minneapolis Star Tribune also talks about how the draft will try to move along more quickly.

Tom Hoffarth at the LA Daily News chimes in with his thoughts on changes in draft coverage

Ditto, John Scheibe, LA Times.

Ray Frager at the Baltimore Sun has local coverage of the draft.

Jay Posner at the San Diego Union Tribune also talks about the NFL’s “less is more” policy on the draft.

Over to New York where the scribes are discussing the resurrection of the career of Harold Reynolds at SportsNet New York. Here’s a piece by Neil Best at Newsday, and one from Bob Raissman at the NY Daily News.

Phil Mushnick at the NY Post talks about how, in his view, the sports media at times spews endless absurdity. Oh…and more Harold Reynolds talk.

In Boston David Scott has a Beantown update, including a move for the Globe’s Gordon Edes to Yahoo!

Dave Darling at the Orlando Sentinel talks to Bob Costas on his upcoming HBO Live Town Hall Meeting on the emerging growth in Sports Media. Make sure you read this Q&A.

Jim Carlisle at the Ventura County Star has a look at NBC opening up the archives.

Random Video Clip #16

Being a football fan, this weekend’s NFL Draft will be must see TV, at least during the first round. I will not be hanging around much past the Patriots’ pick at number seven, or wherever their first pick will take place. I have a life.

Other than the Pats. the highlight for me is to see who the Jets and Giants pick, given that the draft is held in New York and the fans come out to sit in the audience to witness, first hand, the shaping of their team’s future.

The Jets’ draft fortunes have been well chronicled..and with them picking just before the Pats at number six, the drama should be high. In case you don’t remember some of the infamous picks made by the Jets here’s a look back…

Coming Out Is Hard To Do

Editor & Publisher (E&P) has the story of the firing of Washington Post staffer Michael Tunison, who was let go after he identified himself as the Christmas Ape, a frequent contributor to the satirical sports blog Kissing Suzy Kolber (KSK).

According to the article, the Post said the firing was as a result of Tunison not abiding by, “standards for people’s outside work” which should have been approved by the Post’s management.  The paper also proclaimed that Tunison’s blogging “brought discredit to the paper.”  Outside work is permitted as long as it is not deemed a conflict of interest.

Tunison responded to E&P by saying, in his opinion, his work at KSK was not a conflict of interest because he was working as a news reporter for a suburban county outside Washington, DC and his beat did not include coverage of the NFL, which is the target of the blog.

I do not read KSK, because I’ve never been a fan of blogs that resort to using crude language to attract readers.  I support their right to produce that content, it’s just not for me. 

In terms of Tunison’s termination, on the surface it looks a little unfair.  But if his work agreement with the Post included the need to seek permission to work elsewhere on his free time, then he did violate the terms of that agreement. 

I do, however,  think the Post may have been too quick on the trigger to terminate Tunison without any apparent period of negotiation.  He was not getting paid for his work at KSK and as long as it did not conflict with his work at the paper, there should have been some compromise reached.

I can understand how language in some of Tunison’s pieces did not sit well with management of the paper.  That indirect compromising of the Post’s integrity may have been his undoing.

I do give Tunison credit for finally identifying himself on the blog.  Coming clean and taking responsibility for your work is always a good idea.  Well, perhaps not in this case.

What They’re Saying, April 18, 2008

Here is the Friday mashup of news and notes form sports media columnists around the USA.

David Scott has his weekly Boston sports media musing in his Scott’s Shots feature…

Over to New York as the NY Times Richard Sandomir has a piece on the plans for the future of the Seattle Sonics.

Bob Raissman at the NY Daily News talks about the latest Ranger antics and how it impacts the NHL on TV..

At Newsday Neil Best looks at how New Yorkers will view the NBA playoffs without any local teams in action..

Justin Terranova at the NY Post has 5 questions for Buck Showalter.

Mel Bracht at the Oklahoman looks at predictions in the Hornets/Mavs series.

Bob Wolfley at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel talks about how TNT’s Charles Barkley is not afraid to share his feelings.

Tom Hoffarth at the LA Daily News says a Boston-Lakers NBA Final would not be bad news for the NBA.   Here are his extended blog notes.

Jay Posner at the San Diego Union Tribune has the same thought…

David Barron at the Houston Chronicle talks of how the Rockets have turned things around.

Michael Hiestand at USA Today talks about how CBS will be covering more college sports.

Jim Williams at the Examiner reports on how fans seem not to be concerned by scndals in sports.

Barry Jackson at the Miami Herald has a talk with ESPN/ABC’s Jeff Van Gundy.

Jim Carlisle at the Ventura County Star has national reaction to the Lakers’ season.

Judd Zulgad from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune criticize Minnesota’s local hockey announcers.

John Maffei at the North County Times looks at ESPN’s venture into film making.

Dave Darling at the Orlando Sentinel also has more on ESPN and the making of documentaries.

Ray Frager at the Baltimore Sun has much on his mind today..

Teddy Greenstein at the Chicago Tribune has the Big Ten Network’s plans for Spring Football.

Questioning Priorities…Again

As a journalist and editor of SMJ I respect the right media organizations have in making decisions over which content will be published or broadcast.  It doesn’t I can’t question those editorial decisions.

Case in point, what viewers of the New England Sports Network (NESN) will be facing tonight.

NESN has the television rights for both the Boston Red Sox and Boston Bruins.  They have been ahead of the curve in providing HD coverage of both teams (home and away) for a couple of years now.  When both teams are playing on the same night, one gets the HD coverage on NESN while the other gets telecast on a regional sports channel (not in HD) called NESNPlus.  It’s not the best of situations but one which should satisfy fans of both teams.

This scenario has come up twice over the past week as the Bruins battled the Canadiens in the NHL Playoffs and the Red Sox began its 2008 regular season. In those two instances NESN made the correct choice in deciding which game would be showcased on the HD mother-ship while the other was sent to NESNPlus.  The Bruins playoff game received the priority both times.

But for some reason NESN has changed its tune for tonight’s conflict.  NESN will be showing tonight’s Sox/Yankees game in HD on NESN while relegating the Bruins/Canadiens Game 5 (with elimination on the line for the B’s) to NESNPlus.  How can NESN justify this move? 

We all understand that New England is Red Sox Nation and this is Yankees/Red Sox.  But the Bruins are in the PLAYOFFS, in a game they must win or go home.  The Sox and Yankees will still play 13 more games this season. 

This makes no editorial sense to me.  Oh wait…I forgot it’s not about what’s the bigger story…it’s about money.  More eyes for Red Sox/Yankess than Bruins/Canadiens.  How silly of me. 

NESN has the right to make the switch.  However it doesn’t make it right.