<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Live Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sportsmediajournal.com/2007/10/25/why-live-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2007/10/25/why-live-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Extra P.</title>
		<link>http://sportsmediajournal.com/2007/10/25/why-live-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Extra P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sportsmediajournal.com/2007/10/25/why-live-blog/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>When I first started my blog, I didn&#039;t get live-blogging either.  But I participated in a few for Awful Announcing, and I kind of &quot;get it&quot; now.  

The point of live-blogging is to gather in commenters and have fun interacting while the game is going on.  It&#039;s the internet version of sitting in a room with your friends and cracking jokes during a game.  And the host of the live-blog gets multiple page reloads, so there&#039;s a definite incentive for him, as well.

Also, in the case of a daytime event like the first round of the baseball playoffs, or the first two days of the NCAA tournament, it&#039;s a fun way to keep tabs on the game while you&#039;re at work.  It&#039;s not the same as sitting at home on the couch, but it does offer a little bit of interactivity.

I guess it all comes down to whether the reader enjoys the writer&#039;s style or not.  I would never do a live-blog where I just called play-by-play.  I don&#039;t see the point of that.  But if I get to make jokes and have a little fun with it, then I&#039;m bringing my own style to the table.

That said, I rarely indulge.  It&#039;s hard to actually engage in the game as a specatator when you&#039;re formulating posts in your head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first started my blog, I didn&#8217;t get live-blogging either.  But I participated in a few for Awful Announcing, and I kind of &#8220;get it&#8221; now.  </p>
<p>The point of live-blogging is to gather in commenters and have fun interacting while the game is going on.  It&#8217;s the internet version of sitting in a room with your friends and cracking jokes during a game.  And the host of the live-blog gets multiple page reloads, so there&#8217;s a definite incentive for him, as well.</p>
<p>Also, in the case of a daytime event like the first round of the baseball playoffs, or the first two days of the NCAA tournament, it&#8217;s a fun way to keep tabs on the game while you&#8217;re at work.  It&#8217;s not the same as sitting at home on the couch, but it does offer a little bit of interactivity.</p>
<p>I guess it all comes down to whether the reader enjoys the writer&#8217;s style or not.  I would never do a live-blog where I just called play-by-play.  I don&#8217;t see the point of that.  But if I get to make jokes and have a little fun with it, then I&#8217;m bringing my own style to the table.</p>
<p>That said, I rarely indulge.  It&#8217;s hard to actually engage in the game as a specatator when you&#8217;re formulating posts in your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

