Monthly Archives: April 2007

SMJ Interview- Jerry Brewer, The Seattle Times

Jerry BrewerI try to read as much from the sports media as I can.  In fact, if you feel there is someone I should be reading on a consistent basis, please, let me know.

While reading a column a few weeks ago I was introduced to Jerry Brewer of The Seattle Times.  Brewer is the cousin of Corey Brewer,  a  member of the two-time national basketball champion Florida Gators.

At 29 Brewer has already accomplished much.  His brief career has brought him to Philadelphia, Orlando, Louisville, and now Seattle. 

In reading his column I found someone who takes a fresh approach to sports writing.  It is easy to pick up on Brewer’s enthusiasm and his genuine interest in the subjects he writes.  That’s not always the case with some sports columnists out there.  As you read the interview, you will see that Brewer took similar interest in answering our questions.

Sports Media Journal (SMJ)- Can you please tell us where you were raised and how sports influenced your upbringing?

Jerry Brewer (J.B.)- I was raised in Paducah, Ky. I was born in Tennessee, but my family moved to Kentucky when I was four. My dad, Rod Hightower, probably had the biggest influence on me, as far as sports is concerned. I really didn’t like sports until I was about 8. I remember my first sports memory was observing my dad and his friends watch the University of Louisville win the 1986 national championship game. I was enamored with how sports brought people together. And over the years, sports became a way for me and my dad to learn to communicate better.

Then I started playing sports — basketball and baseball mostly — and fell in love with the games. But I always seemed to look at sports as an outsider, even as a player. It was like I was watching myself and my team play. I thought about angles and storylines in a “What if they happened?” manner. I was probably too inside my own head to be a great player. Later, I learned the reason I was having these thoughts: I was meant to be a sports writer.

SMJ- What influenced you to seek a career in sports journalism? Who did you
read/listen to/watch growing up?

J.B.-I remember the day so well. I was a sophomore in high school, and Thomas George, who was an NFL writer for The New York Times at the time, came to speak to our class. He was from Paducah. He attended Paducah Tilghman High School. He was once a member of the church I attended. He was from a neighborhood two minutes from mine. I wanted to be like him, because I thought he was so cool and his job was so cool. Before he spent that hour speaking to us, I really didn’t understand you could make a living and go to cool events writing about sports.

From that point on, I read tons of newspapers. I remember, about a mile from my house, right next to school, there was a newspaper stand that sold The Chicago Tribune. I walked to school every day it was warm enough and made sure I bought a Tribune on the way. I bought the paper for Mike Royko more than the sports section. He was getting older then — this was about 1994 — but he was still amazing. I don’t write like him, but I’ve always judged an A-level columnist on Royko’s standard.

A few Kentucky sports guys greatly influenced me early on. At that time, Chuck Culpepper was a columnist for The Lexington Herald-Leader. He was amazingly creative and fun. Pat Forde and Rick Bozich were at the Louisville Courier-Journal. I just thought they were an amazing 1-2 punch.

A few years later, I became big fans of Joe Posnanski (not a bandwagon Pos guy; I was with him before he mastered his craft), Mitch Albom and Mike Wilbon.

SMJ- Where did you go to college? Were you active in the college newspaper?

J.B.- I attended Western Kentucky University. Best four years of my life. A very underrated journalism program. I worked for the campus newspaper, The College Heights Herald, from the minute I stepped foot on campus. Being able to experiment and learn practical journalism at The Herald made my career. I would not be 29 years old with four years of experience writing a sports column without The Herald.

SMJ- What was your first sports writing job? Was it what you expected? What
did you take away from it?

J.B.- My first job out of college was at The Philadelphia Inquirer. But my first sports writing job really was a gig at The Paducah Sun, in my hometown. I was 16. My parents told me I needed to get a job and make a little money on my own. I went straight to the paper and begged them to let me do anything. They gave me a part-time gig doing agate. Then I begged them to let me write. They started letting me cover high school games on Friday nights and other local events. Later, I had an official summer internship, working between sports and news.

It was everything I expected it to be and more, honestly. I remember the passion I had and the energy I would put into even the most piddly assignments. That’s what I learned most, the hunger it takes to succeed. I hope that I always have keep that mentality of being a Paducah guy trying to make it big.

SMJ- Your bio indicates you worked in Philadelphia, Orlando, and Louisville before Seattle. These three cities seem to take their sports seriously on different levels. What was working in these cities like? What did you learn from those experiences?

J.B.- Each experience has been as different as the cities. In Philly, I had to toughen up real quick. Philadelphia is an intense sports city. The fans are no joke. And they know their teams so well. I did an internship at the Inquirer, but coming there for my first full-time job was a totally different thing. I had never been criticized by readers for giving the home team too much credit, for not being hard enough on them. It was eye-opening, but it was great, too.

Going to Orlando was as big a change as you could get. Orlando has only one pro team, the Magic. There are so many transplants that people’s interests are so varied. The cool thing about the sports section there is they use those things to their advantage. I was able to be really creative in Orlando, take more chances. The editors there were great. The late Van McKenzie was the sports editor then. He was a tremendous influence on my career, as well as Lynn Hoppes. They just pushed me. Nothing was ever good enough to rest on. And they taught me to think big.

I went back to Louisville for two reasons: An opportunity to return closer to home and a chance to write a different kind of sports column. I had been promoted to sports columnist for my final year and a half in Orlando. It was going well, but I wanted a different kind of challenge. So I came to Louisville. The biggest difference was that pro sports didn’t matter much there; it was college sports dominant. Which I knew going in. And the readers were as intense as the Philly readers. It was great to have so many eyes on my copy, scrutinizing it to no end. It was a special time. I always say that being a sports columnist for the Courier-Journal meant more to me than any job I’ve ever had. Unfortunately, I didn’t stay there but about 20 months. My desire to write in a larger market overwhelmed my desire to be at home.

And here I am in Seattle. It’s been eight months now. Seattle is a very laid-back sports market. The fans could stand to be more fiery and emotional. But I’m digging how cerebral the readers are. Some really, really intelligent people read the paper out here. I love the challenge of matching wits.

SMJ- What do you like about working in Seattle?

J.B.- Everything but the rain, my friend! Like I said, the intelligence of the readership is astounding. Every sport that I really care about is here: NFL, MLB, NBA and major college athletics. There are enough characters here to keep me interested: Mike Holmgren, Shaun Alexander, Matt Hasselbeck, Tyrone Willingham, Ray Allen, Ichiro, Lorenzo Romar, etc.

I also think I’m more in sync with this newspaper’s philosophies than any newspaper I’ve worked for. That’s special, having that natural chemistry.

And the city is terrific, even with the rain. It’s the most visually interesting city in the United States. Built on seven hills. Mountains in the background. Water. I’m always amazed at the views while I’m driving.

SMJ- How different is it writing a column as opposed to being a beat writer? Which is more challenging?

J.B.- I don’t know if the question is, “Which is more challenging?” They’re both challenging. The amount of energy and attention to detail you must have as a beat writer is incredible. The offseason is more difficult to cover than the regular season. You’re always grinding on a beat, man.

For me, writing a column has been the toughest job I’ve ever had. It’s a lot more difficult to have 3-4 opinions a week than you think. As a beat writer, you want to write well, but the information is most important. As a columnist, your writing has to be sharp every tme you write. In some ways, you’re a star attraction. You always must be “on.”

I’ll tell you this: I have way more sleepless nights after bad columns than I did after bad stories.

Others might tell you differently. The typical columnist doesn’t start at 25. You usually work a lot longer as a beat writer, get a little older, develop more knowledge. I’ve been more like a prep kid going straight to the NBA with this. It’s been an adjustment for me, but I’m glad the Sentinel gave me the opportunity at such a young age. I think I’m starting to hit my stride.

SMJ- What is your goal when you cover an event as a columnist? Is it your intention to find angles to a story that may not be evident in the course of the game? How do find these angles?

J.B.- Posnanski talked to me once about being a five-tool columnist. The five tools are: Compassion, humor, the hammer (being tough enough to rip people), reporting and writing the big event. When I cover an event, my goal is to find a unique angle while also depicting the game’s relevance accurately.

Here’s the thing: There are hundreds, sometimes thousands, of media covering these events. Why go unless you have something different to say? If you’re going to cough up the same old themes, your paper should just take copy from a wire service.

How do you find these angles? You just open your eyes and allow yourself to. We’re all different people with different interests and different insights. If you have the confidence to trust yourself, then it becomes quite easy to see the sports world differently.

SMJ-As a columnist do you feel the need at times to use your platform to examine issues off the field? As an example, the Don Imus/Rutgers Women’s Basketball controversy.

J.B.- Absolutely. We have such a readership and such influence. We’d be negligent if we didn’t tackle some of the tougher off-the-field issues. Sports are so much more than just games. We can really affect society positively if we write our columns the proper way.

SMJ- What has been the highlight of your career to date?

J.B.- Seeing my cousin, Corey Brewer, win back-to-back national basketball championships with Florida while having the challenge of covering it as a journalist. I couldn’t be the same ol’ dispassionate observer. That would be false, and the readers would pick up on it easily. So I explained the relationship and didn’t pretend that I wasn’t invested in the game. It was different, but fun. And very educational. It really taught me that it’s OK to use your heart when writing.

SMJ- Do you have a favorite column? If so, what was it?

J.B.- When I was in Louisville, I went calorie for calorie with a jockey for a week. I followed The Jockey Diet and wrote about it. My stomach has never growled so much. It was torture to report, but fun to write. And well read, too.

SMJ- What are your favorite sports to cover?

J.B.- Being from Kentucky, I’m a huge basketball guy. I love covering it. I also love covering the Olympic sports because the stories are more about the people than the results. I really enjoyed horse racing, surprisingly, when I worked in Louisville. And, of course, football and baseball, but I cover so many of those games. Football, I think, is the hardest to cover. There are so few games, and they take on a life of their own. There are so many details you want to get into each column, but you can’t.

SMJ- What are your thoughts on how the new media is making an impact on journalism? How do you use this new media?

J.B.- I sit right on the new school/old school fence when it comes to new media’s impact on journalism. I’m a big Internet guy, so I like perusing online, looking at the new and different things people are doing. Technology is great. At the same time, I think the Internet can allow just anybody to call himself a journalist these days. We need to be careful with that. And readers need to be smarter. Just because somebody is writing like an enraged fan and letting you do the same on a message board doesn’t mean that it passes for legit media.

SMJ- What are your professional goals going forward?

J.B.- In a word: mastery. I really want to figure out the craft of writing a sports column and write a great one for a long time. Then I figure I’ll write books and teach on the side for a living. I have no aspirations of being an editor or anything like that. I’m a writer. I’ll be typing until I fall out at my computer. They better bury me with my laptop, too.

_______________________________________________________________

In reading Brewer it is evident that he has a bright future.   Baseball scouts point to top prospects as having “five tool skills”.  Even though he may not admit it, Brewer has the make-up to be one of Posnanski’s “five tool columnists”.

(Photo Courtesy The Seattle Times)

To What Extent Should News and Sports Coverage Mix?

I have been disturbed since Monday night over the tragedy at Virginia Tech University.  The scope of the tragedy speaks for itself.  What has bothered me is the coverage of the horrible events.  The wall to wall news coverage is to be expected…and appreciated.  What I question is the level that the sports media has felt the need to chime in on the story.

There have always been instances when the news and sports divisions of a media organization have merged on a story.  Sometimes in tragedy (the 1972 Munich Olympicsthe 1996 Atlanta Olympic Bombings), sometimes in embarrassment (drugs in sports) and sometimes in celebration (any championship victory).  In each of these cases news coverage was generated as a result of what took place at the sporting event.

In the case of the Virginia Tech shootings, the sports media has tried to take a strictly news event make it relevent in the sports world.  As the events of what took place unfolded, I don’t think it is appropriate for the sports media to weigh in.  Did the media really need to get the comments of Hokie football coach Frank Beamer and men’s basketball coach Seth Greenberg so early in the course of events on Monday?  Unless there were student athletes involved in the shootings, the remarks either coach were not relevent to the story.

What has become a legitimate sports story thus far in this tragedy is the announcement on the status of sporting events at Virginia Tech as a result of the shootings. 

Some sports radio shows have tried to embrace the role of news analysts in using their show to discuss the tragedy and ask the questions that the news organizations are also examining.  It just seems out of place to me.

There will be plenty of time for sports media organizations to report on this story, especially when the university looks to its sports programs as an outlet during the healing process.  Those stories should be covered by news and sports divisions alike.  Unless the tragedy occurs during the course of a sporting event, the sports media should let their news divisions handle the coverage of news. 

SMJ Interview- Bruce Allen, Boston Sports Media Watch

Boston Sports Media Watch  (BSMW) is celebrating its fifth anniversary this year.  In that time it has risen to to be a must read for Boston sports fans and, even though they may not admit it, sports media alike.

The site is run by Bruce Allen, a self described “tech-guy” who uses the site to provide a comprehensive accumulation of articles from the media outlets that serve the Beantown sports scene.  He normally publishes his blog twice a day, Monday through Friday.  He also uses the site to lend his take on the people who make up the Boston sports media.  And believe me, in the sports hotbed that is Boston, the sports media contingent can be equally as intriguing as the teams they cover.

Bruce was generous enough to take the time to answer some questions about how he organizes his site and how the Boston sports media is unlike any other…

SMJ:  Can you tell us a little about yourself?  Were you born and raised in the Boston Area?  No matter where you were raised, who were some of your sports heroes growing up, and why ere they so special to you?

B.A.: I was born and raised in New Hampshire, and my parents were not sports fans while I was growing up, so my exposure to the teams was what I could read in the newspaper, listen to on my little radio and watching the Red Sox with my great-grandfather when I visited him.  Watching the Red Sox during the last years of the Carl Yastrzemski era was a bit of a down time for the team, but I still watched as much as I could of Yaz and Jim Rice. But like most New Englanders my age, Larry Bird was who I wanted to be and I read every single thing I could get my hands on about him. 

SMJ: Did you follow the sports media growing up?  Who were some of the newspaper, radio, and television sports reporters/play-by-play men you remember?  Which ones left an impression on you?

B.A.:  Believe it or not, I really liked Glenn Ordway back in the day. I used to listen to all the Celtics games on the radio, and so he and Johnny Most were my connection to Bird and the Celtics. Glenn also did “Sportscall” on WRKO with Guy Manilla, and you wouldn’t recognize the guy who now refers to himself as “The Big O.” I really enjoyed that sports talk. Ken Coleman was doing the Red Sox games on radio, and I remember camping out in the back yard listening to him call the games with a young Joe Castiglione.

SMJ: Tell us about your professional background and specifically how you came to form Boston Sports Media Watch?  How long has it been in existence?

B.A. The website actually just marked it’s fifth year in existence. I launched it in April, 2002. I didn’t have any media background…I was a tech guy, and decided to use a little technical know-how to try and practice a little at something I was passionate about.
 
SMJ:  What do you think attracts people to BSMW?  How many visitors do you get in a given day or week?

B.A.:  For the month of March, 2007, there were 201,335 visits and 339,332 page views. Those are fairly typical numbers. I think people like the convenience of the site, having all the stories in one place and organized for easy browsing.

SMJ: You seem to rely on many sources from which you compose your daily post.  How many sources do you monitor on a daily basis?

B.A.:  In my Firefox browser, I have a bookmark that opens up 21 sites in tabs which I then go through to put together the mornings posts. In the afternoons I’ll look through another 20 or so for other relevant headlines.

SMJ:  Do you read all the stories you reference?  If so, do you read them primarily online, or in print?

B.A.:  I do give them all at least a quick read, and they’re almost always online, unless I happen to be somewhere where I only have the physical copy…like a waiting room or something.

SMJ:  How early in the morning do you start assembling your morning posts?

B.A.:  Most mornings it is by 6:00am, but during busy times, like baseball playoffs if the Red Sox are involved, or the day after a Patriots game, I may have to start as early as 5:00 am. Not being a morning person, that is a real challenge.

SMJ: How do you keep track of all your sources?  Do you use a news aggregator?  If so, how has this tool made your job easier?

B.A.:  In the mornings, it’s strictly the online sports sections, which are pulled up with that group bookmark I mentioned earlier. During the course of the day I keep up with news using Google Reader. I have over 50 feeds that I subscribe to which assist me in keeping up with the latest headines.  These are a mixture of blog feeds (Deadspin, Sports Law Blog, Ben Maller) or baseball blogs (Globe, Herald, Projo, Courant) Football (Reiss Pieces, Point After, Cold Hard Football Facts, Adam Schein) and other sports, technology and blogging feeds.

SMJ:  You usually provide a late afternoon posting on the site?  What types of articles make it into the afternoon posts?

B.A.:  I try to make them either Boston related, or media related. I’ll include some of the national media columns that come out during the week, or perhaps some other big stories that would be interest. I also try to sprinkle in a little more commentary during those posts as well.

SMJ:  The Boston sports media is described as one of the toughest when it comes to covering its teams and players.  Do you feel this is accurate?  Why?  Is it unfair to the teams and players?  What makes the Boston sports media scene so unique?

B.A.:  I think it is a little overblown, and perhaps a media creation. They like to describe themselves as tough. New York and Philly can be just as tough or worse. As far as being unfair, most certainly. With so much coverage, everyone is out to distinguish themselves from the pack, and might use hyperbole or insults to bring attention to themselves. The most unique aspect of sports in Boston is the passion of the fans and their quest for news and information about their teams.

SMJ:  Blogs like yours are having more of an impact in breaking news.  Should the casual fan begin to rely more on blogs as a reliable news source?

B.A.: Well, it depends on the blog. An interesting part of the new media is the fact that the reader also has a responsibility in all of this. They have to be able to discern what might be reputable and what isn’t. Good blogs that earn the trust of their readers can be considered a news source, as long as they stay accountable and responsible.

SMJ:  Do you view BSMW as a relayer (sic) of Boston Sports media news or a breaker of it?  Why do Boston fans care about the sports media? 

B.A.:  I think the main page of BSMW relays news more than it breaks it. David Scott on the sub-blog of Scott’s Shots has broken plenty of media news over the last years. Boston fans care because they see these people as their up-close connection to the teams and athletes. These media types are all over print, television and radio, and because of that, people want to know more about them.

SMJ:  Should each major news organization in Boston have an ombudsman?  In effect is that your role? 

B.A.:  I believe they should have one. It is part of being accountable to your customers. I don’t see myself in that role, though I suppose there are times that I carry out that role.

SMJ:  You have sometimes been critical of the Boston sports media.  How have members of the media reacted in general to BSMW?  You must have your fair share of supporters and detractors.  

B.A.:  Plenty of both, but I’d say more support than criticism. A lot of the media types acknowledge the need for something like BSMW, and are even willing to share a little “dirt” on their colleagues. It’s a challenge sometimes to be able to see through the various agendas in that regard. I have found that some of the media types who have no problem taking shots at athletes and teams are themselves some of the most thin-skinned people on the planet when you criticize their work.

SMJ:  What aspects of the Boston sports media scene do you like?  What parts do you not like? 

B.A.:  I like the depth and breadth of coverage available to fans. I don’t like the agendas and need to make ridiculous statements and nasty insults in an attempt to bring attention to themselves.

SMJ:  Sports radio in Boston definitely has a cult following, with WEEI consistently being rated as one of the top stations in the Boston market.  Why do you think Boston fans gravitate to sports radio so much? 

B.A.:  Fans want an outlet to get news and opinion about their teams. I think WEEI benefits from a great signal, and none of the stations that have attempted to become a challenger to them have had a signal that was decent enough to allow a large enough audience.

SMJ:  What role do you think the print editions of the Boston Globe and Boston Herald will have in the future of sports coverage in Boston?  In the face of declining subscribers, should they start charging for access to their web content? 

B.A.: They should absolutely not start charging for web content. Never. Subscriptions do not make newspapers money. Advertising does. They would be making a huge mistake in going to a pay model.

SMJ:  Can the local television news sports segment continue to survive given the growth of the new media and 24 hour sports coverage on cable T.V.?

B.A.:  It has been a shrinking segment for years now, and it’s not going to go back to how it was before. I can see a newscast in the future where there is no “sports guy” – the news anchor delivers the relevant sports news of the day. 

SMJ:  Quick Hits:  Favorite Boston Print Sports Beat Reporter: B.A.: Mike Reiss

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Print Sports Columnist: B.A.: Bob Ryan

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Television Anchor: B.A.: Mike Giardi

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Television Play-by Play Announcer:  B.A.: Mike Gorman

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Television Color Analyst: B.A.:  Dennis Eckersley

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Radio Play by Play Announcer: B.A.:  Gil Santos

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Radio Color Analyst: B.A.:  Cedric Maxwell

SMJ:  Favorite Boston Sports Radio Talk Show Host: B.A.:  None

SMJ:  Other than BSMW- Internet sites you turn to for Boston Sports News:  B.A.:  Too many to list here.

SMJ:  BSMW is part of the larger Bruce Allen Media.  Tell us about some of your other Internet properties.

B.A.:  Nothing too big right now. I have other interests beyond sports (hard to believe) and just created a few other sites as outlets for those.

SMJ:  What are your plans for the future of BSMW?

B.A.:  I would like it to become a full-time venture at some point. I have plenty of ideas and material to fill the days. I would like a site re-design, but after 6 months of interviewing web firms, I haven’t yet found one that I feel comfortable with. I would like to add some audio and video elements and perhaps a few more weekly columns.

Bruce Allen has done a lot with a little in five years.  He has built a dedicated following to his site.  Whether you follow the Boston sports scene or not, Boston Sports Media Watch is a worthy one-stop shop to what the media in Boston is covering.

Let’s Hear from You!

We have been up and running for a little more than a month and we are still experiencing some growing pains.  We appreciate those of you who have checked in to the site!

We have made some minor changes to the site to make it easier for you to comment on our posts or send us feedback.   You no longer need to register to comment on a post.  You can also comment anonymously.  Please use common sense when you do respond.

We have plans in the works to provide interviews with those in the sports media as well as other feature articles we feel you will enjoy.  We also want to hear from you as to what you would like to see on the site.  Use our contact page to let us know who you would like us to interview or some aspects of sports media you would like explored.

Please return often!  Thanks!

When Will P.C. Just Stand For Providence College?

When did we become so concerned about making sure everything we say was not offensive to anyone?  The media needs to take a deep breath and stop being so concerned about how what someone on the air says may potentially be offensive to some group or person.

Today we tend to overlookwhat people say in its proper context.  We also ignore the intent of one’s words.  Take Billy Packer, for instance.  Much is being made today about a comment he made on the PBS’s Charlie Rose Show.  Billy Kimmel brought it up on his show the other night.  For some reason Packer’s comment that Rose “fagged out” on him for not showing up to help him out is getting way too much play in the media.

I need to get an explanation as to how what Packer said is offensive to anyone?  It clearly was a light hearted comment between himself and Rose and Rose himself laughed about it.  In this instance the only person who had any right to be offended was Rose…and he wasn’t.  End of story.  To make a story out of it is just foddder for those who:

  1. Hate Billy Packer (and there ate plenty of those people out there) or
  2. Just want to create a stir for the sake of making a stir.  These people need to get a life.

The problem I see is that it appears the media has a blanket set of unwritten rules on what can and cannot be said on the air, beyond the seven dirty words made famous by George Carlin.

Packer is not alone.  Boston Celtics radio color analyst Cedric Maxwell was called to task on his comments during a game when he questioned a call by referee Violet Palmer by saying she should “get back in the kitchen”.  It was evident when you hear the comments that there was no intent to offend Palmer or women in general.  Maxwell was making a joke (albeit not a funny one). The outrage that ensued led to Maxwell issuing an apology the next time he took to the air.

Hateful speech should not be tolerated.  What Packer and Maxwell said was not hateful or derogatory in any way.  We need to be smart enough to make distinctions.    Remember, those who report or announce the action are describing a GAME…just a game.  Let’s all lighten up a bit.